J.P.SOMMERVILLE
367 - 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
The classical literature of Greece and Rome was an
important element in elite culture. Mastering Latin was essential to
an early-modern gentleman's education. | |
|
Popular culture was largely oral. Printers did produce
"penny merriments" and "penny godlies" -cheap broadsides and ballads
aimed at the low end of the market - but most people listened, not
read. They attended sermons and plays and heard pamphlets read aloud. | |
|
The degree to which ordinary people and the educated minority shared the same beliefs varied during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries; by the end of the period, elite and popular attitudes to witchcraft had begun to diverge quite sharply, for example.. |
|
|
"And, sith there's no justice in
earth nor hell,
We will solicit heaven and move the gods To send down Justice for to wreak our wrongs"
(Titus Andronicus 4.3) |
|
When Shakespeare was writing, the belief that God
intervened in the world to punish individuals or nations for their
sins was held throughout the social scale. The Protestant Reformation
emphasized the authority of Scripture and it contained many examples
of direct divine providence: - the Deluge and the destruction of Sodom
and Gomorrah were two of the most cited examples. |
| "Not a whit, we defy augury:
there's a special providence in the fall of a sparrow. If it
be now, 'tis not to come; if it be not to come, it will be
now; if it be not now, yet it will come: the readiness is all"
(Hamlet 5.2) |
"Are not five
sparrows sold for two farthings, and not one of them is
forgotten before God? But even the very hairs of your head are
all numbered. Fear not therefore: ye are of more value than
many sparrows."
(Luke 12:6-7) |
John Foxe's Acts and Monuments (commonly known
as the Book of Martyrs) (1563) - one of the
most popular works of Protestant piety - took as its main theme God's
defense of true religion in England.
|
Parliamentarian propagandists and Oliver Cromwell
repeatedly called on providence to explain why their victories in the
field over Royalist forces represented God's will for England.
|
|||
Naturally enough, the Royalists countered by insisting
that the Restoration of Charles II to the throne was the real
demonstration of divine intervention.
|
|
During the late seventeenth century, books still appeared listing instances of God's intervention in the world in general, and in English political affairs in particular. Sir Henry Spelman's History and fate of sacrilege (1698) was a particularly influential instance of this genre. | |
|
But by this period, this view was on the defensive
amongst England's educated classes. Anticlericalism, skepticism, deism
and growing scientific knowledge were amongst the most important
factors in undermining belief in God's direct intervention in his
Creation. | |
|
Belief in providential punishment of sins did survive in a diluted form, but was now seen as acting through natural mechanisms - venereal disease afflicted the rake, poverty the gambler, and gout the drunkard. In contrast, religion made people healthy and wealthy. |
|
The belief in God's regular and direct intervention in the world encouraged petitionary prayer - prayer petitioning God to grant us things. | |||
The governments of Elizabeth, James and Charles tried
to keep prayer within the limits of set forms - the Anglican Prayer
Book provided prayers for the various services. In contrast, Puritans
preferred to make up prayers for each particular occasion - this was
known as praying ex tempore, and if performed skillfully could
earn a minister a reputation for inspiration.
|
Chance and lots |
|
Puritan moralists often insisted that nothing happened
by random chance - God controlled all the events in the world.
|
|||
|
One of the reasons that puritans condemned gambling was because the casting of lots or dice was seen as an appeal to God. The drawing of lots was meant to be reserved for serious matters, just as in the Book of Acts, the Apostles "gave forth their lots" to select Judas' replacement. | |||
|
Thomas Gataker in Of the nature and use of lots (1619) argued that such matters were beneath the divine radar, but his arguments did not convince the pious. | |||
Lots were used by the Parliamentary
authorities to decide which regiments should be sent for service in
Ireland and to pick those to be executed for the pro-Leveller Burford mutiny.
|
|||
The puritanical regimes of the Interregnum
disapproved of all forms of gambling and tried to discourage them, but
time changed on the Restoration of Charles II.
|
Miracles |
|
|
Protestants believed in divine intervention in the
world, but they also held that the age of miracles was past. God had
performed miracles to confirm the truth of his Prophets and
Apostles, but now that the faith was established there was no longer
any need for such signs. |
| "It must be so;
for miracles are ceased; And therefore we must needs admit the means How things are perfected" (Henry V 1.1) |
|
Roman Catholics continued to believe that God could and did perform miracles at the request of his saints. (Indeed, the canonization process required at least one miracle as proof of the candidate saint's direct line to God). | |||
|
At the opposite end of the religious spectrum,
biblical literalism led some extreme puritans to believe that
prayers for cures, exorcisms and inspiration would be answered.
|
In 1591, William Hacket, an unbalanced illiterate with
links to London's puritans, proclaimed himself the Messiah and
attempted to raise a rebellion against Elizabeth I.
|
Hacket attracted little or no support and was soon
executed.
|
The Restoration establishment was deeply hostile to
any claim to miraculous powers whether in Puritan enthusiasts or Roman
Catholic mystics. They viewed such claims as indicative of mental
instability or fraudulent deception.
|
Prophesy |
|
In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the belief
that astrology might be used to predict future events was widespread
in all social classes.
|
|
Prophets not only claimed to foretell future events, but to do so by God's help. Biblical Prophets had exhorted, warned, and led God's people, and during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries a number of English men and women felt inspired to do the same. | |||
|
The Church of England's authorities believed that Scripture contained everything necessary to salvation and regarded such claims as false and dangerous. In 1636, for example, two weavers claiming divinely inspired knowledge of the future were imprisoned by High Commission. (They died in prison years later still asserting they would rise again and reign eternally). | |||
The Unitarian Edward Wightman not only denied the
Trinity but claimed to be the Prophet Elijah. He was burnt in 1612 -
the last person to suffer this punishment for heresy in England.
|
John Traske (c.1585-1636) also made claims to being a
prophet - in his case a new Elijah. (Elijah was an especially popular
choice because The Book of Malachi contained a promise to send Elijah
to warn of the world's end]. Traske also believed that he could
perform miraculous cures. For his view (later recanted) that
Christians were still bound by the Judicial Law including its dietary
laws (no black-pudding), in
1618 he was whipped and the letter J burnt on his
forehead.
|
Prophesying the monarch's death was a peculiarly
dangerous form of prediction. Elizabeth Barton "the Nun of Kent"
claimed that the Virgin Mary spoke to her during her numerous
trances; she predicted that Henry VIII would die a miserable death if
he persisted in his attempts to divorce Katherine of Aragon. Instead
she was executed, without a trial, in April 1534, having been
attainted by Parliament.
|
||
|
The English Civil War stimulated millenarian
expectations and led to still more prophesy. Even educated clergymen
considered the possibility that God might be shedding "New Light" in
such stirring times. |
| "When
the Quakers first rose here, their societies began like witches,
with quaking, and vomiting, and infecting others, with breathing
on them, and tying ribbons on their hands. And their actions as
well as their doctrine showed their master. When some, as
prophesying, walked through the streets of cities naked; and
some vainly undertook to raise the dead (as Susan Pierson at
Worcester:) And usually they disturbed and publicly reviled the
most godly ministers worse than the most debauched of the rabble
did."
(Baxter Certainty of the Worlds of Spirits) |
|
The Restoration brought a clamp-down on prophetic activity. Educated men treated all claims to spiritual inspiration as signs of madness. | |
|
Although many sixteenth and seventeenth century prophets certainly seem unbalanced, it is also true that claims to prophesy received attention and even respect. This allowed people from groups otherwise excluded from expressing their opinions (the poor and uneducated, women and children) to command an audience and speak authoritatively. |
Ancient prophecies |
![]() |
|
English society of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries was deeply conservative. Even revolutionaries who wanted to change government and society couched their claims as attempts to recreate a past golden age. The Levellers and Diggers, for example, looked back to an ideal society that had existed in England before the Norman Conquest. | |||
So powerful was the appeal of the past that even
prophecies of future events were often credited with ancient authors.
A favorite prophet was Merlin - the wise wizard of King Arthur's
court.
|
|
|
King Arthur was credited with uniting Britain after the departure of the Romans in defense against barbarian invaders. He held a special place in popular affection and King Henry VII was trying to tap this when he called his eldest son, Arthur. |
|
The Tudors not only traced their ancestry to King
Arthur, but still further into distant and legendary history - to
Brutus, the son of Æneas of Troy. |
| Thomas Campion (1567-1620) used both the Merlin
myth and the Arthur legend in framing a flowery compliment for
James I. James I himself used the legend of Arthur for propaganda purposes, calling himself "King of Great Britain." |
"Merlin, the great King
Arthur being slain, Foretold that he should come to life again, And long time after wield great Britain's state More powerful ten-fold, and more fortunate. Prophet - 'tis true, and well we find the same, Save only that thou didst mistake the name" |
Yet ancient prophecies were also used to subvert the
established government.
|
||||||||||
|
Ancient prophecies were used by Thomas Wyatt and his accomplices in the plot to overthrow Mary I, and in the Duke of Norfolk's plot against Elizabeth in 1572. | ||||||||||
|
A common theme of prophecies was that some ancient hero (Arthur, Edward VI, Elizabeth, Oliver Cromwell) was not really dead but sleeping and would eventually return to dispense justice and overthrow oppressors. | ||||||||||
|
The same secularization and science that undermined belief in divinely-inspired prophets also decreased the belief of the educated in ancient prophecies. Furthermore, better historical scholarship exploded many of the British myths as it became apparent that they had been invented by much later authors such as Geoffrey of Monmouth. | ||||||||||
|
Scientific progress also helped encourage the belief that human history was a story of progress and that the future would be better than the past - the Golden Age of the distant past was replaced by the Brave New World of a future Utopia. | ||||||||||
| "This is a brave night to cool a
courtesan. I'll speak a prophecy ere I go: When priests are more in word than matter; When brewers mar their malt with water; When nobles are their tailors' tutors; No heretics burned, but wenches' suitors; When every case in law is right; No squire in debt, nor no poor knight; When slanders do not live in tongues; Nor cutpurses come not to throngs; When usurers tell their gold i' the field; And bawds and whores do churches build; Then shall the realm of Albion Come to great confusion: Then comes the time, who lives to see't, That going shall be used with feet. This prophecy Merlin shall make; for I live before his time." (King Lear, 3.2) |
![]() |
![]() |
|---|