J.P.SOMMERVILLE
TOLERATION |
![]() |
367 - 9 (3) |
|
In Shakespeare's day, English law required that everyone attend church on Sundays and Holy Days. Those who failed to attend ("recusants") were subject to fines of £20 per month, were excluded from certain offices and could lose their lands. | |||
|
Attendance at religious services other than those approved by the Church of England could also result in heavy penalties, including imprisonment. | |||
During the Civil War, there was wide de facto toleration
and Oliver Cromwell's regime tolerated almost all Protestants.
However, Roman Catholics continued to suffer disabilities (such as
paying double taxes).
|
|||
|
Anti-Trinitarians, Ranters, Quakers and others who held extremely heterodox views were also penalized by local magistrates. Oliver Cromwell insisted that all ministers who received state support (that is to say, who held livings in the national church, and were maintained by tithes) should accept certain fundamental doctrines, and he set up "Triers" to investigate candidates for such jobs. | |||
In the Declaration of Breda (April 1660), Charles II offered a degree of religious toleration.
|
|||
|
The Anglican fervor of Charles II's Parliaments and the inability of the Presbyterians and Bishops to work out a compromise at the Savoy Conference (1661) led instead to an exclusively Anglican settlement. Protestant Dissenters suffered various restrictions on their worship and civil rights until the Glorious Revolution, | |||
|
The Toleration Act of May 1689 granted a limited toleration to Presbyterians, Independents Baptists, and Quakers; - they could worship freely but were excluded from public office. (Catholics and Unitarians were still liable to prosecution). |

Great Tew
|
In 1615 an anonymous Baptist tract argued that all loyal subjects - even Catholics - should be allowed freedom of worship. Their position was very unusual but seventy-five years later it was widely accepted. | |||
|
In the years before the Civil War, to the few puritan sectaries asking for a toleration of (most) religious beliefs, were added some Anglicans unhappy with Archbishop Laud's oppressive policies. These thinkers often met at the home in Great Tew of Lucius Cary, Viscount Falkland and so became known as the Tew Circle. | |||
|
After the Restoration some of the Latitudinarians influenced by Tew Circle ideas became important in the Church of England - these included Jeremy Taylor. | |||
Puritan radicals such as
William Walwyn,
Gerard Winstanley and
John Milton also advocated religious
toleration.
|
|||
Another important advocate of toleration was Roger
Williams (1603?-83). A graduate of Cambridge University, Williams
emigrated to Massachusetts and became a minister at Boston.
|
|||
Another Cambridge graduate, John Goodwin (1594?-1665) established an Independent
congregation in London and wrote tirelessly against the Presbyterians'
attempts to impose religious uniformity on England. His tract Right
and Might well met (1649) was written in support of the army's
coup against Parliament, but he later withdrew his support from Oliver
Cromwell in protest at the institution of the Triers.
|
|||
|
Jeremy Taylor (1613-67) was another graduate of
Cambridge University. Unlike Williams and Goodwin, he supported episcopal rule and
was patronized by Archbishop Laud. During the Civil War and
Interregnum, he lost his living and lived on the charity of various
Royalist gentlemen. At the Restoration he was appointed to an Irish
bishopric. | |||
|
Many of the arguments in favor of religious toleration developed by Goodwin, Taylor and others were repeated by John Locke. John Selden and Thomas Hobbes afforded the government generous powers to control the expression of beliefs liable to cause social conflict, but advocated intellectual freedom in general and were keen to curb the powers of clerical authorities to impose religious beliefs. |
Reason and religion |
|
The English Civil War convinced many people of the
troubles caused by religious enthusiasm. During the Restoration
period, increasing numbers of the wealthy and educated stressed
the reasonable elements of Christianity and downplayed inspiration.
Deists saw God as the creator of order whose will was embodied in the
laws of nature and reason.
|
||
|
Latitudinarians also distanced themselves from spiritual revelation and argued that ethical conduct was more important to the true Christian than the fine points of doctrine. | ||
|
Thomas Hobbes was the most extreme example of skepticism about revelation and insistence that nothing unreasonable should be believed. | ||
Hobbes was seen as an atheist, but John Locke was
certainly a sincere Christian. Yet in his
Reasonableness of Christianity (1695) he so stressed the
compatibility of Scripture with reason that he was accused of
Socinianism. In his
Letter concerning toleration (1689) Locke proposed the
toleration of virtually all religious beliefs that weren't seditious
or dangerous.
|

Poussin, Adoration of the Golden Calf
|
Those who supported the imposition of uniformity argued that Divine Providence would punish any nation that permitted idolatry, blasphemy and heresy in its midst. During the seventeenth century, the advocates of toleration countered that religious freedom promoted peace and prosperity. The Dutch Republic - the most tolerant country in Europe - was also the most prosperous; intolerant Spain entered a long economic decline after deporting its Jewish and Muslim minorities. The Edict of Nantes (1598) granting religious toleration brought peace to France; its Revocation (1685) lost the nation its industrious, skilled Huguenot community. | |||
Increasingly, the role of government was perceived as
wholly secular and civil allegiance
as separate from
religious opinion. The magistrate's role was to maintain civil peace so
that people could pursue their temporal welfare. Religious truth would
best emerge from a free open market in ideas.
| |||
|
Another argument used to support toleration was that
compulsion only led to
hypocrisy and deceit. (There was even the risk
that heretics who endured cruel punishment would be
admired and
imitated). | |||
|
In any case, persecution might be used against the truly godly if the magistrate were wicked or misled. It was safer to avoid establishing a precedent that might be used in the wrong way. | |||
|
The Tew Circle idea that only a few Christian doctrines were fundamental gradually spread widely, and allowed people to see minor differences of opinion about worship and dogma as unimportant enough to be tolerated. |
![]() |
![]() |
|---|