|

|
Poland in the Seventeenth Century |
|
The Polish rider
(Rembrandt) |
|
Sigismund III (1587-1632)
 | Sigismund III (Zygmund)
was a member of the House of Vasa - Sweden's ruling family and had
reigned in Sweden from 1592 until 1599 when he was deposed for his
attempts to reintroduce Catholicism. A patron of the Jesuits, Sigismund embraced the Catholic cause in Poland just as
enthusiastically. He allied with the Hapsburgs, marrying Anne of
Austria, sister of Ferdinand II (and then
their sister
subsequent to his first wife's death).
"Three
T's make up our King: Taciturnity, Tardiness and Tenacity"
(The Polish verdict on Sigismund III). |
|
 | In 1598, with the help of his Polish subjects, Sigismund invaded Sweden in an
attempt to overthrow Charles and
regain the throne, but was defeated.
 |
In 1600, Charles retaliated by
invading the Polish province of
Livonia. The Poles fought back,
re-conquering Livonia and defeating the Swedes in a series of
battles. |
|
 | The expense of Sigismund's war, his "incestuous" marriage to
Constance (his dead wife's
sister) and a series of proposals to expand central government
combined to make Sigismund widely unpopular. In 1606, dissident
nobles led by Mikolaj Zebrzydowski raised a Roskosz
(rebellion) against
him. Sigismund cleverly responded with studied moderation,
conceding the demands of Orthodox rebels so as to isolate the
Protestants. When Zebrzydowski called outright for Sigismund's
deposition, the magnates rallied to his support, and the rebels'
force dissolved in disorder before a magnate army. |
 | Sigismund treated the rebels with great moderation, and in 1609
the Sejm pardoned them and reiterated the right of nobles to
resist royal excesses. Any constitutional moves that would
strengthen central power foundered. |
 | In 1609, Sigismund's ambitions turned to Russia, where various
Polish nobles who had supported the claim of the
False Dmitrii to the Russian
throne were already fighting. Provoked by
Swedish intervention in Russia, Sigismund invaded (September 1609), besieged Smolensk and occupied
Moscow. |
 | Sigismund's attempts to make first his son, Wlasdislaw, and then
himself Tsar provoked a fiercely nationalist response from
Russia. The Polish people were content with having gained Smolensk (June 1611)
and stopped voting taxes to support the incursion.
|
"This left the
Polish garrisons in Muscovy in a most awkward position, since
the forces of the national movement had them under siege. First
they ate grass and offal, then they ate each other, and the
survivors finally surrendered. The Moscow Kremlin fell on 6
November 1612"
(Parker). |
Despite these setbacks, Sigismund continued to
nurse the ambition that Wladislaw might become Tsar.
|
 |
Sigismund's armies had mixed success against the
Turks. Sigismund had tried to help his Hapsburg allies against the
Transylvanian Prince, Bethlen
Gabor, who responded by conspiring with the Ottomans to attack
Poland. The Turks were initially successful defeating the unprepared
Poles at Cecora (1620)
|
 |
In 1621 it seemed Ottoman success would be repeated, when
65,000 Poles and Cossacks were surrounded at Chocim (Khozim) by
almost 200,000 Turks.
Heroically led by the aging Jan Karol Chodkiewicz (1560-1621), who died soon after, the Poles fought to
their last barrel of gunpowder and finally turned the tide with a
desperate cavalry attack on their besiegers.
The Battle of Chocim was commemorated in
an epic poem by Waclaw Potocki, Wojna chocimska (The War of
Chocim). |
 |
Wladyslaw IV (1632-48)
|
 |
Sigismund's son
Wladyslaw (Ladislaus) IV (1595-1648) was less religious than his
father. He eased restrictions on Orthodox Poles granting them
religious liberty at his Coronation Diet, and recognizing their
bishoprics.
Wladislaw also made peace with Russia (June 1634), abandoning all claim to
be Tsar of Russia. |
 |
Wladislaw IV had been elected king unanimously in
thirty minutes, and he wanted to keep the nobles on his side. He
planned to increase his power by transforming the Cossacks into an
effective army, defeating the Tatars, and leading a crusade to
recapture Constantinople from the Turks.
Turning these pipe dreams into practice was not easy. |
 |
The Polish nobility were all in favor of
"registering" some Cossacks as regular soldiers whilst
reducing the rest to serfdom, but the Cossacks themselves (many of
whom had fled serfdom) resisted all attempts to register only some of
their number. |
 |
The Orthodox Cossacks were also very suspicious
of Catholics. They wanted to plunder Tatar wealth on the Black Sea,
not mount a campaign to bring Moldavia and the Crimea under Polish
control. |
 |
Wladislaw needed the consent of the Sejm
to attack the Turks, but in 1647 it refused to consent and demanded
the demobilization of the Cossack army that Wladislaw had been
preparing. |
 |
Bohdan Khmelnytsky
(1595-1657) (Polish
Bohdan Chmielnicki , Russian Bogdan Khmelnitsky) was born
into a wealthy Cossack family. He was Orthodox but received some of
his education from the Jesuits. Captured at the Battle of Cecora, he
was imprisoned in Constantinople for two years where he learnt
Turkish. Denied justice when his son was killed in a local feud, he
fled to the Zaporozhian Cossacks and was elected hetman in
1648. |
 |
The Cossacks had been
disappointed by the Polish government's refusal to carry through on
the plan to attack the Tatars, and so were receptive to Khmelnitsky's
scheme to ally with the Tatars and attack the Poles instead. |
 |
May 1648, Polish forces
were twice defeated by a joint Zaporozhian-Tatar army - joined in the
second battle by many "registered" Polish Cossacks. Later the same
month (16 May) Wladislaw (who had been personally liked by many
Cossacks) suddenly died. |
The Deluge (Potop)
John II Casimir (1648-68)
 |
John Casimir
(1609-72) (Polish Jan Kazimierz) had
fought with Hapsburgs against France and spent the years 1638-40
imprisoned by the French. He married Marie Louise de Gonzague-Nevers,
his brother's widow (May 1649).
|

Janusz Radziwill
|
Casimir was despised by
some magnates including Jerzy Lubomirski and the Radziwills -
Janusz and Boguslaw.
In 1652, Janusz Radziwill used his liberum veto to bring
government to a halt. He soon moved from disruption to treason -
conspiring with the Swedes to divide Lithuania from Poland and
himself become King of Lithuania. |
|
 |
John Casimir's first problem was the Cossack
rebellion, and in the summer of 1651 the Poles managed to defeat the
Cossacks in heavy fighting (partly because the utterly unreliable
Tatars had changed sides again, bribed by Casimir). |
 |
Khmelnytsky
looked around for allies and found a number - Janus Radziwill and
George II Rákózi of Transylvania were both eager to profit from Poland's
problems. However, it was the
Russians' intervention
in support of the Cossacks that was most important. |
 |
The Russians invaded
Lithuania in 1654. This deeply alarmed Sweden, who feared that the
security of its territories on the Baltic Coast would be undermined if
the Russians seized Smolensk. In 1655, the armies of
Charles X of
Sweden invaded Poland.
|
 |
The Swedish were initially
very successful - occupying Krakow (Cracow) , Sandomierz and Warsaw. Radziwill
and other magnates transferred their allegiance to Charles. In 1657,
George of Transylvania invaded in fulfillment of his alliance with
Charles X. |
 |
Then the tide turned.
Denmark attacked Sweden, and Charles X had to withdraw most of his
troops to deal with the threat. The Dutch - fearful of a Swedish
stranglehold on the Gdansk trade that
was so important to their economy - allied with Poland. A Dutch fleet
was sent to raise the blockade of Gdansk. The Elector of
Brandenburg-Prussia attacked Swedish troops in Western Pomerania. The
withdrawal of Sweden compelled George Rákózi
to retreat south and then surrender. |
 |
Furthermore in 1657, Khmelnytsky
the Cossacks' inspirational leader, died. Their new Hetman, Ivan Vyhovs'kyi, concluded an agreement with the Poles called the Union of
Hadiach. It guaranteed the rights of Ukrainian noblemen within Poland,
but not of most Cossacks and they refused to accept it. The Russians
saw it as a betrayal of the
Pereyaslav (Pereiaslaw)
Agreement and attacked Vyhovs'kyi's Polish-Tatar-Cossack force. A
stalemate resulted between Russian and Polish forces that was finally
resolved in the Truce of
Andrusovo (1667). |
 |
In 1660 the Peace of
Oliva was concluded between Poland, Sweden, and the United Provinces
The Dutch gained free passage through the Baltic Sound. John Casimir
abandoned his claim to the throne of Sweden. |
 |
Poland did not have peace
for long. In 1666, angered by the attempts of Casimir and his wife to
guarantee their control of the army and of the succession to the throne,
Jerzy Lubomirski mounted a new Rokosz against the crown.
(Lubomirski was hand-in-glove with the Hapsburgs, who resented French
influence operating through Marie Louise de Gonzague-Nevers). |
 |
Worn out and receiving
little support, John Casimir abdicated (16 September 1668) and retired
to France. |
|

Jérémi Wisniowiecki |
Michael (1669-73)
 | Michael
(Michal Korybut Wisniowiecki, 1640-73)
was the son of Jérémi Wisniowiecki - a wealthy magnate who had
led the Poles to many success against the Cossacks. Michael was not
cut from the same cloth.
|
|
"His only
accomplishment was that he could speak eight languages, but he
had nothing intelligent to say in any of them, and he quickly
settled down to a minimum of ruling"
(Zamoyski). |
 |
Michael's election had marked the triumph of
those who wanted a purely Polish candidate over the French and
Hapsburg factions. But Michael promptly married Eleonora of Hapsburg,
sister of the Emperor Leopold. However, he did not rule in the
Hapsburg interest or anyone else's.

Kamieniec Podolski |
|
 |
The Turks invaded in 1672, captured the important
fortress of Kamieniec Podolski and turned its cathedral into a mosque.
Michael's envoys capitulated to the Turks at Buczacz, signing away the
remaining Polish-held Ukraine and agreeing to pay tribute to the
sultan.
|
"[Michael]
exercised no control over the magnates, the Army, the Turks,
his wife, or the Nuncio. It is very difficult to learn how
exactly he occupied his mind. He died on 10 November 1673 from
a surfeit of gherkins, presumably in his prime"
(Davies). |
|
John III Sobieski (1674-96)
 |
John (Jan)
Sobieski (1629-96) had been Grand Hetman (Commander in Chief) of
Poland since 1668. On the day after Michael's death, Sobieski
inflicted a crushing defeat on the Turks at
Chocim. |
 |
Sobieski returned in triumph to Warsaw during the
electoral Sejm and was acclaimed king. |
 |
In 1665, Sobieski had married
Marie-Casimire de la Grange d'Arquien, called by
him "Marysienka" as a term of endearment. He spent much of his
life away campaigning against Turks and Tatars, but corresponded
regularly in long, affectionate letters, packed with historical
information. [Unfortunately, her replies have not been preserved].
|
| The palace of Wilanow, constructed
for Jan Sobieski, 1681-86. |
 |
 |
Jan Sobieski's maternal grandfather and his
brother were both beheaded on the battlefield by Tatars, and his uncle
died in Tatar captivity. Sobieski was never at any risk of
underestimating the Ottoman Empire. Soon after his accession he
reorganized the army, but initially adopted a pro-French,
anti-Hapsburg policy that required compromise with the Ottoman Empire.
The Treaty of Zórawno (Zurawno) of
October 1676 conceded most of the Turkish territorial gains granted in
the Treaty of Buczacz, but Polish slaves were released and
tribute payments stopped. |
 |
Sobieski soon grew tired of his alliance with
Louis XIV: - the French promised much but delivered little and
expected Poland to be a compliant anti-Hapsburg client.
|

Sobieski's march |
Sobieski allied with Leopold against the Turks
(April 1683) and despite French protests, led an army to assist
Vienna against the Ottomans laying
siege to it. |
|
 |
For a brief interval Sobieski was the hero of
Europe, but he received few practical benefits from the victory. Noble
dissension (including a faction around Sobieski's own son, Jacob)
prevented any real exploitation of Turkish weakness. Southeastern
Poland was less vulnerable to Tatar and Turkish attacks, but Sobieski
schemes to seize Moldavia and Walachia failed. |
 |
The final years of Sobieski's reign were marked
by magnate disorder (especially in Lithuania), disruption of Sejms
by the liberum veto, and his failure to engineer any sort of
structural reform in Polish government. |
 |
In the eighteenth century Poland gradually
descended into anarchy and was carved up between neighboring states. |
|