|


| |
Elizabeth I & her parliaments
|
 |
 | Parliament was an important institution, but its sessions
were occasional not continual. It sat for about three of
Elizabeth's forty-five years. In many years, Parliament did
not meet, and it usually sat for only about three months when
it did meet. |
 | Elizabeth decided when to summon Parliament and when to
dismiss it. She could veto any law, for law required the
crown's consent as well as that of the two Houses. |
 | The two primary functions of parliament were legislation
and taxation. (Theoretically, parliament advised the monarch
on policy, but Elizabeth never paid much attention to its
advice.) |
 |
There were fifty-seven male
peers when Elizabeth acceded. Along with them in the House of
Lords sat twenty-three bishops. |
 |
In 1547, 343 MPs were
returned to the House of Commons. By 1601, that number had
increased to 462. Each English county elected two members, and
each Welsh county sent one. The remainder sat for
boroughs -
the crown increased the number of borough seats and filled
them with its own servants. |
|
|
I |
25 January -
8 May 1559 |
|
II |
12 January -
10
April 1563
30 September 1566 - 2 January 1567 |
|
III |
2 April -
29 May
1571 |
|
IV |
8 May -
30 June
1572
8 February -
15 March 1576
16 January -
18 March 1581 |
|
V |
23 November 1584
- 29 March 1585 |
|
VI |
29 October1586 -
23 March 1587 |
|
VII |
4 February -
29
March 1589 |
|
VIII |
19 February -
10
April 1593 |
|
IX |
24 October 1597 -
9 February 1598 |
|
X |
27 October -
19 December
1601 |
|
The House of Commons
The House of
Lords
 |
The number of peers remained roughly
constant throughout Elizabeth's reign: 57 at her accession; 55 at her
death.
In 1558, these consisted of one duke, one marquis, 15 earls, two
viscounts and 38 barons; in 1603, of one marquis, 16 earls, two
viscounts and 36 barons. |
 |
14 noble families died out for lack of a
male heir, and six noblemen were attainted, but Elizabeth created a
few new titles to make up the numbers.
|
George Clifford
3rd earl of Northumberland
(1558-1605), a nobleman whose life coincided almost entirely
with Elizabeth's reign. |
|
 |
The House of Lords was generally pliable to
the royal will, but occasionally they took a stand. In 1563 and 1566,
the Lords spearheaded attempts to insist that Elizabeth marry and
establish the succession. |
 |
Twenty-three bishops also sat in the House
of Lords. Because, bishops were royal appointees (dependent on the
queen for future career advancement), they tended to vote as the queen
wished. There were occasional exceptions: for example, in 1566-67
Elizabeth was infuriated by the protest of two archbishops and 13
bishops when she ordered a church reformation bill stopped in the
Lords. |
Relations
with parliament
 |
Parliament had been little more than a
rubber stamp in the first half of the sixteenth century. During
Elizabeth's reign, the House of Commons became increasingly confident
and assertive. |
 |
The belief was widespread that the crown
should finance ordinary expenses from permanent revenue sources
(chiefly, customs and rents from royal lands.) Direct taxation by
parliamentary subsidies was seen as an emergency measure. |
 |
Parliament did vote taxation to cover war -
against Spain and in Ireland - but the proceeds were inadequate.
Elizabeth was forced to sell crown land, thereby decreasing ordinary
revenue. Receipts from land were in any case falling, as inflation
outpaced rent increases, for land was generally let on long leases. |
 |
Elizabeth turned to various (dubiously
legal) means to increase revenue; e.g. leaving bishoprics vacant so
she could pocket episcopal income; e.g. licensing privateers to rob
the Spaniards in exchange for a cut of the profits.
 |
Another royal money-making scheme
was issuing monopolies - one person would be given the sole
right to sell or manufacture a particular commodity provided
he paid for the privilege.
Playing cards and dice were two of the
commodities on which Elizabeth issued a monopoly, but others
were on more necessary items such as vinegar, starch, sweet
wines and salt. |
|
 |
These schemes produced political problems -
the most notable being the Monopolies Debate of 1601, where there was
really significant opposition to royal policies in parliament. |
 |
On many issues, however, royal policy was
largely in accord with public sentiment. Measures against religious
dissent, the Catholic threat, vagabonds, and so on passed easily
through parliament because generally popular with the political
nation. |


|